Thursday, September 15, 2011
I thought Google was God?
Missing Holden
How an older woman can write from the viewpoint of a 16-year-old boy is an exercise in enchantment sometimes. The story here is about discovering you have a terminal ailment and having parents who don't believe in allopathic medicine and falling in love at perhaps the best and worst time of your life. There are moments when the boy seems preternaturally wise but then that may have something to do with the fact that he's dying. In any case, using the parallel of Salinger's Holden Caulfield as a Holy Grail works well and I finished the book in one sitting. I love the fact that Salinger wrote and wrote for the rest of his life and refused to publish saying he was writing for himself (who else do we write for), and somehow that was at the back of my mind when going through Catcher, Caught (great title). Perhaps because the loneliness inherent in it was echoed in Daniel Landon, boy wonder for not very long. Also, some of us never really age in our heads, do we. That's a good thing when reading work like this when you need to understand youth, passion and waste.
Friday, September 9, 2011
Monday, August 22, 2011
Next Big Thing: Jason Momoa

Tuesday, August 16, 2011
In love with a Zsadist
So ok, I'm in love, a couple of times over. Recently, I received a treasure trove from Flipkart and gloated over it for a week before I started reading. While I began with the delicious Kresley Cole, I became immersed in JR Ward's books before I knew what had hit me, and it's been like a drug ever since. The last time I felt so excited and light as air was when I read Ignatius' story in A Confederacy of Dunces, and since the author offed himself right after he wrote that, I was denied any further fixes.
But Ward never stops; she is, of course, one of the lucky ones who found her calling and as any writer of worth (haha, inside joke) knows, the story tells itself. But the author's sensibilities is the crucible it must go through and lor' luv 'er, Jessica knows what matters in this world and sinks herself deep into love, loyalty, the pain that forges character, loss and courage. The thing, though, is this: Each is doled out with such a level of intensity that the reader is thrilled to the toes. You know, that's what matters in daily life, not what you do but how deeply you feel. Cutting roses for a bouquet? You better feel the petals and inhale the fragrance and poke at the soil and admire your stretch of garden and imagine the way the arrangement will play out on the wooden table in the kitchen. You thought you could just cut and run? Sure you can, if you're brain-dead.
It's the same with friendships. You just want to hang with people you don't really give a damn about and listen to them warble about their kids and their job and the game Saturday night but at least, hey, you aren't alone? They are a waste of space and you are wasting your time. Instead, get into a band of brothers who fight the good fight and fall in love with all the lightheartedness of a boulder. You will have a favourite and his name will be Zsadist, with his inner core of sweet and an outer layer of pure intimidation. It's his suffering that calls out to you, though, and the way he deals with it, like a man. Your next favourite will be V, short for Vishous. Goatee, light eyes, smart and sexy as hell. Then there's Rehv whose screaming masculinity and absolute power comes close to, I don't know, mainlining H? He's also got purple eyes.
And then it's, surprise, surprise, the gay boys Qhuinn and Blay. Now I have no particular interest in the gay scene but after reading the conversations between Q and B, I want a whole book dedicated to them. They are so cool, so strong, so in love, so honourable. Ward, I'm sorry to report, has said she might do a novella because she has to keep her (straight) fan base in mind.
I also draw the line at the very wimpy female characters who hum and haw their way through these warriors' lives, but I especially dislike Jane, V's chosen. I hear Ward was not satisfied with V's story either and I can tell her why: Jane is just not the right mix for him, even though Ward has made her almost masculine keeping V's tastes in mind (subtle touch, LOVE his relationship with Butch). I like Rhage, Wrath, Beth, Butch, John and Bella, and I can tell Ward does, too. She, and the reader, don't much care for Phury, though. He's just too damn needy is what it is.
One point of embarrassment: awful proofing in the BDB books and Ward doesn't seem to know the difference between wretched and retched and on http://www.lovevampires.com/jrward.html, she seems to think roll means role (unless that's the interviewer's problem).....what the what?!
But honestly, if these books aren't made into movies it would be a crying shame.
Monday, July 4, 2011
Big Bang BS
Friday, July 1, 2011
Free your mind, and John Galliano
There isn't a single individual I've spoken to who hasn't slammed Galliano for his recent rant, but if you stop and think (a lonely road, of course, but necessary), how many of us have lost our tempers and said the most vicious things without meaning a damn word? That would be all of us, I'm guessing, so let's take the lonely road for a minute.
Madonna once admitted courageously that when the world turned its back on MJ, she did, too, and regretted it. Obviously, no one has learned anything. I waited with bated breath for one voice to defend the man (not some sotto voce comments from the suddenly timid fashion crowd) whose genius has been lapped up for years, but just ended up going blue in the face. What a world. Governments can kill political/ideological opponents and get away with murder, literally, but you can't get drunk and freak out for a few minutes. No, because then they will call you anti-Jewish (in the first world, you can be anti-Muslim but not anti-Jewish) and the French (the French!) will slap a court case on you for being racist.
What is John supposed to plead now? That some of his best friends are Jews? Or, like that idiot Tracy Morgan, take classes and meet gay (substitute any word you want here) people to 'understand' them better? Morgan of course did this after an attempt to be funny by saying he would hate his son to talk in a 'gay voice'? (See? Not funny. But I dare one parent to come out and say they would like their child to be homosexual, knowing that child will then suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous youknowhat for the rest of his/her life.)
It's rumoured that Kate Moss will wear Galliano for her wedding today, and although she may do it remembering her own fall from grace a few years ago and how all the rats deserted her sinking ship then, my faith in humankind will be somewhat restored.
Still, what we suspected for years is now clear to all: In countries where freedom of speech is tom-tommed as if the Holy Grail has just been discovered, it is other people who will decide whether you have that freedom or not.
As for all those suits who made private jets and yachts and trophy blondes out of Galliano's work, meanwhile, and dropped him like he had the bubonic plague? They would do well to remember the old saying: Karma is a bitch.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Amitav Ghosh and the wrong Nobel

The writer was in Bangalore recently for the launch of his new book Smoke on the Water, or was it Waves in the Wind, ok, ok, it's River of Smoke, the second in his trilogy of books set in the 19th century (surely he should move with the times?) where he talks about great human migrations against a backdrop of the opium trade. Shobha De was also in town and had said in a talk the same day that she thought Ghosh would one day win the Nobel. It certainly won't be for Pronunciation. It is not, I repeat not, non-ka-lunce, Mr Ghosh, but, now say it after me, non-sha-lonce.
Oh, dear, it was all nearly as depressing as hearing chef Bobby Chinn lauding some great 'restauranteur' on his TLC show World Cafe Asia.
Loved the questions from the Bangalore audience, though. One young boy asked how Ghosh kept the sense of his characters since his books came so many years apart, another that the real question on everyone's mind was: What was Ghosh's own opium experience?
The author's responses were clever. Writing a trilogy kept his memory strong and was a great strategy against Alzheimer's, he said, and we all have had opiate experiences - from taking cough medicine to coming out of anaesthesia and feeling euphoric.
The clincher though was when a woman said one review of River of Smoke mentioned the use of a lot of terms that she couldn't understand herself, that were incomprehensible and funny, (possibly this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/8559117/River-of-Smoke-by-Amitav-Ghosh-review.html )Ghosh replied that if she found it funny then it must not have been too incomprehensible. I fear the lady meant funny as in odd, but you can't deny the author's handling was masterly.
Ghosh saying he kept reviews at bay was a tad disingenuous, however. So he's writing for himself? He doesn't need to know what other people think of the books they're paying good money to buy and read? Sorry, we'll only take that from JD Salinger.
Dig this Daisy chain


Marc Jacobs makes some of the ugliest clothes on the planet, (what's with that peacock-shade lame with an oriental twist he's got going recently?) but he knows his fragrances. Daisy is best-selling for a reason, creating a worldwide daisy chain of success, because it evokes sunny days lying on the grass and in the distance seeing the love of your life walking towards you. Daisy is sharp, sweet and memorable, both innocent and worldly. Almost as dreamy as Ed Hardy's Love & Luck with its coconut and lemon zest.
How important is fragrance, really? Let me just say this: While women love their lotions and potions because it makes them feel special, nothing is a bigger turn-on than their men smelling sensational, too. It's like drawing a map that leads a woman straight into bed, all without saying a word. Sex without conversation as a precursor? That's like having all your Christmases coming early.
Footnote: Speaking of Ed Hardy, how cool is this bag that I got for free with the Ed Hardy fragrance.
Sunday, March 13, 2011
James Franco v Leo DiCaprio
Movies, in any case, are back in the limelight after a few desultory years. With True Grit, The Fighter and King's Speech, I am one happy camper.
My mind is on Leo DiCaprio, though - my hero. There is nothing about him I don't like. The fact that he dates supermodels (a bit tongue-in-cheek I've always thought) and doesn't marry; that he shuns award ceremonies but when he does arrive he handles himself with grace; that he, reportedly, fools about on set until the word Action! is spoken and then it's like a curtain has fallen and he is instantly the character he's playing...there is no movie he's ever been in that was not utterly watchable. People admire and respect him and yet he retains his mystique, and year after year there is one amazing movie after another. How does he do it? Maybe we should ask Franco to research the boy wonder and tell us – and learn a thing or two while he's at it.
Of course the reason he doesn't go to award shows is because they often have no integrity. Imagine not giving DiCaprio the Oscar for Aviator? Or not acknowledging him in Catch Me if You Can or Basketball Diaries or Shutter Island or Inception. (And ignoring directors like Scorsese and women directors like Streisand for Decades.)
The Academy for Motion Pictures gang is made up of people whom you have to pucker up to, and if you don't, well, there will be no golden boy for golden boys.
Why Charlie needs to get out more
Because that, really, is the secret to life, the answer to Why are we here? What is the purpose of our existence? Does any of it matter? You know, those daft questions white people ask themselves and their gurus in ashrams. The answer is that life is extraordinary. Just look out the window, or consider your day spent lounging in a Parisian cafe, reading a book in the window-seat of your home, working as a graphic novelist, or eating pigeon pie in Marrakesh. Oh, Charlie, you need to get out more. Somalia awaits.

