Sunday, November 8, 2009
Some Fringe benefits, but...
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Another Tarantino classic
Inglourious Basterds’s opening scene is an instant classic. There is a bucolic image of the verdant French countryside where a man is seen in honest labour, chopping logs and a young girl is hanging up the washing. A car comes up the winding drive, inside are three men in uniform. As the car comes to a halt, you see the men are in German uniform, are in fact Nazis, and the watcher’s adrenalin notches up. This is the beginning of an agonizingly slow build-up of terror that ends, as expected, badly.
The sole survivor of the Jewish extermination in microcosm, Soshanna, goes on to work in a cinema house in France. The mark of the beast is seen on her face, devoid as it is of feeling. But when she learns that Hitler and his crew will attend a premiere at her theatre, she comes back to life and plans murder with relish. In this she has unknowingly become part of a parallel plot, one spearheaded by the Basterds, men who hunt Nazis for sport. The opening scene is invested with so much human emotion that you would think everything else will be an anti-climax. Not in Tarantino’s hands. It is, instead, the start of an almost 3-hour extravaganza that fulfills all our secret desires. When it comes to making a great film, it’s all about the director - look at the debacle of Twilight. Here, Tarantino has got the most compelling performance from every one of his players. Diane Kruger makes up for Troy with a mean, tough spy persona whose death is as terrible as the times; Brad Pitt continues his comedic streak after the marvelous Burn After Reading (his white jacket scene before the climax is hysterical) and Christoph Waltz as the SS maniac Max Landa (the Who? you’re asking in your mind you never will again after Waltz wins the Oscar next year) mingles hilarity, horror and self-seeking to the point that mad though he is, you miss him when he’s not onscreen. Rod Taylor’s few minutes of screen time as Winston Churchill is invested with all the power the WW2 hero embodied and Melanie Laurent (who apparently screamed on the streets after being told she was in the movie) as Soshanna is vulnerable, steel-cored and unforgettable.
There’s been a lot of talk about the title of this movie. A slurring of reality, sometimes a spoof, sometimes a comic strip, that’s what’s in a name. When QT misspells the title, we need to figure out why; this is what the director wants us to do when he says it’s just his way of spelling it, or that it’s his homage to Basquiat.
The script is vintage Tarantino, long dialogues that keep you straining so as not to miss a nuance, that allow the characters to luxuriate in their skins. It’s no surprise that Inglourious Basterds has made four times what it cost.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
forgive him anything
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
What if....
Now that the Indian elections are over, I wonder……
What if Sonia Gandhi had been a blonde Italian? I don’t think she would have found the level of acceptance she has found in the country, even if she chose to wear simple, cotton sarees. She would have done an Evita act and, very possibly, been hounded out.
Speaking of Sonia’s simple cotton sarees, so like her late mother-in-law’s, I like Michelle O, even though she tries so hard to be Jackie O. Those bodycon, simply-cut dresses, those pearls, the coiffed hair, the stand-by-your-man stance…the reason why she deserves respect is not just because her man deserves that kind of stance but because she seems remarkably heartsound herself. Her interviews, like Marilyn Manson's, are so articulate and clever they give you a delicious shiver up the spine. It's rare, you see, to find clarity of thought out there.
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Land of the…….
You think the longer you live, the less likely you are to be shocked. Not true. Even though I am a Glambert as they say, before reading the following on E!Online, I would have said that the talk of not voting for Adam Lambert because he was gay was just trying to reason away the unthinkable AI result. Maybe, I thought, the majority just likes mediocrity, maybe that’s all there is to it. I think the following snippets which you can find (unless E’s moderator is back from whatever rock he/she was hiding under) beneath The Big Picture on E!’s site speak, astoundingly, for themselves.
If this doesn’t stop the exodus to
Under Adam Lambert’s pic, you will read this:
“Can you say "So gay"?”
“Why is he being photographed? he didnt even win...and thank god! A freaky cross dresser shouldnt be an "IDOL"
“Fucckin faggott! * .Im so happy He didint win american Idol!”
“I personally can't wait for this freak's 15 minutes to be up. People, there are 1,000's of people like this weirdo in theater, they all sound and act the same, he's absolutely NO DIFFERENT. When I saw those very very very disturbing pictures of Adam dressed as a blue devil with his tongue stuck down some little man wearing makeup's throat, I completely lost anything I might have liked about this transvestite. He seriously has issues, and how someone like him got past the AI producers is beyond me. Now I'm reading somewhere that there are pictures of him in his early 20's making out with a 16/17 year old boy. If that's true, aren't we supposed to draw the line when it comes to sexual predators? I honestly cannot believe that
Under
“Her negrofied attitude makes me think it would have done her some good to work on my great great grandfather's cotton plantation.”
“this baby is f**king ugly just like all the other "no spik english" babies out there.”
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Thank God Adam's not America's idol
When the idiots say Adam Lambert screams, I guess they didn’t hear Feeling Good, Tracks of My Tears and If I Can’t Have You.
When the idiots wonder whether he is gay, I guess they don’t know that their brother, sister, aunt, uncle and give a parent or two may be gay as well. (I take it for granted that the idiots don’t know that being gay isn’t a choice.)
When the idiots say he’s theatrical, I guess they have never watched a great play which they will remember for the rest of their lives.
When the idiots say the judges liked Adam too much, I guess what they really mean is that the judges should have lied so they could have voted for Adam as an underdog and not because he was unusually talented. That’s AI for you.
There is a question on the AI site which reads : ‘Does anyone else feel strangely protective about Adam?’ The reaction he evokes is as unusual as his talent.
Here was a boy who was young, focused, bursting with the kind of ability no one had ever seen before, and who delivered a polished apple to his teacher every single week. We bit and were hungry for more. But some saw the apple with a serpent in its core, complete with ebony fingernails and blue-black hair. They wished for milk instead. They got it. But the rest of the planet got more. We have found Adam Lambert and we will remember him for the rest of our lives. Every future success will be toasted by his acolytes from New Zealand to Israel – that is a large swathe of the planet – and he will by then be No 1 on the fan pages set up by E!Online (he is now No 3, and no, the Idol winner is nowhere to be seen).
I have watched AI for years, been a diehard fan, looked forward to those four months more than birthdays, anniversaries or world travel. Now, I can never watch it again, on a matter of principle. Who wants to see injustice, talent ignored? We have enough of that in our daily lives. Of course my abstinence will mean nothing to AI, but that’s ok, now AI means nothing to me.
One of my favourite lines ever is this: “When a true genius appears in the world, you will know him by this sign, that there will be a confederacy of dunces against him.”
‘Nuff said.
Monday, May 18, 2009
Movie on DVD: Never Back Down
As for Cam Gigandet, what a sublime face and all he has ever got is to play the villain which he does well, granted, but in everything from Twilight, The OC and now this? A bit much.
Someone give him a saga in the Rocky mould and we’ll discover a superstar.
The Reader, Bernhard Schlink

Saturday, May 16, 2009
What Simon said
There’s just something about Adam, apart from the ease with which he delivers his notes to us - like strawberries dipped in Nutella. He is calm, fun-loving, not a mean bone in his body and so chockfull of charisma that when he is on stage, we have eyes for no one and nothing else. And of course I’m over-reading the sitch, as Buffy would say, but I see in Adam’s mother’s tears watching her son become a worldwide phenomenon before her eyes, the sorrow over the years when she thought he was just a loser.
The fact that this phenomenon is standing with that mediocre talent going by the name of Kris Allen is enough to make my already simmering BP go up, up, up. Yes, Kris sang ONE song well, Kanye’s great Heartless, but ONE song does not a superstar make. Yes, every teenybopper in the country votes for his cute babyface and that should have taken him only so far. To stand next to Adam Lambert? What a travesty. That spot belonged to either Matt G or Allison.
***************************************************
Another reason why Adam’s the One is because he never gives those utterly annoying fingers up to the camera when his numbers are being read out. I remember Jordin Sparks doing it to the point where it looked like she was having an epileptic seizure, and Danny Gokey’s heart symbol throughout this season has made me want to bring my lunch up. (What in the world, btw, was Sparks' Battlefield nonsense? More epileptic seizures was what it looked like. She needs to hunker down in Biosphere 2 for a few years and figure out how to be somewhat genuine in the talent dept. and not so bloody daft.)
Did anyone, I wonder, notice how Danny’s Joe Cocker song was so like Adam’s iconic Tracks of My Tears? The way he sat on the stool with the musicians on a line with him and tried to be soulful. Oh dear. And his homecoming was marked by nothing so much as Jamar getting his 15 minutes with a vengeance.